Page 4 of 38 FirstFirst 1234567814 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 372
Like Tree238Likes

Thread: A very exciting UAD product that may change the way you record - Townsend Lab...

  1. #31
    Experienced UAD User
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    104
    Probably much more than $300-350 since this is a system that includes high quality hardware.

  2. #32
    Heavy UAD User
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    552
    Quote Originally Posted by Marsrock View Post
    Probably much more than $300-350 since this is a system that includes high quality hardware.
    Slate's is around $1,000 so I guess that would be a starting point.

    H

  3. #33
    Practically a UAD Expert Hoenerbr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    1,986
    Quote Originally Posted by Horse View Post
    Slate's is around $1,000 so I guess that would be a starting point.

    H
    IDK I think we may get lucky and the price point would be way less than Slates. Slates has its own Mic Pre as well as a Mic plus software. With this one just a Mic and software. If they want this thing to really take off, I would say somewhere in the $500-$600 price range would really do well. Then they'll make more money on adding addition Mic's at an additional charge later. Just guessing, I have no affiliation with them. Hope we hear more soon!
    yettibrad likes this.

  4. #34
    Practically a UAD Expert
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,219
    On the concept of mic modeling itself ...

    Cant help but think that the quality and engineering of the mic itself is important. Scrubbing up a cheap Chinese mic intake with software doesnt sound appetizing but sounds like a lot more than that going on. But then again I invested in a vintage amp and pedals for my guitar and now am very impressed with the UAD Fender amp and pedals as well as Axe and Kemper.

    I guess I am representative of the guy that says its hard to capture real analog hardware with software based on stuff done a few years ago.

    And then you see what UAD does (I have almost all of their plugins) and then you see the amp sims and then the room sims (OWS) - and realize that good dsp modelling is a viable way to even get the feel of the amp. Still on the fence about Soundworks trying to get an acoustic guitar sound after the fact although I like it as a creative tool.

    Long winded way to say what is the quality/engineering (third party manufacturer?) of the mic itself - does it sound good on its own -what is its "hardware" sound - very clean to allow character at the plugin level?

    And is the general thought for the home ITB hobby guy (me) is that like OWS gives us access to OWS with adjustments allowed, this gives us access to a mic locker we cant afford and a recorded sound hard for us to get in our home less than ideal sound situation and for the pro - simply another creative tool to add to their mic locker and studio room?

    Have to laugh at myself that I am resistant to the dsp thing based on early experiences with Boss early modeling guitar gear and each hardware type - comp, eq, reverb etc and then amp and pedals, I gradually succumb and eat my words and right now mic modeling sounds goofy to me. History has proved me wrong.

    Next frontier is dsp modeling biology - vocal chords - dial in a Bowie, Bono, Morrison, Vedder, Young, Dylan voice - (voice from the talkback mic - can I get a bit more Dylan scratchy growl please?)
    Last edited by sjgam; 21st July 2016 at 06:45 AM.

  5. #35
    UAD User
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    54
    Quote Originally Posted by Hoenerbr View Post
    IDK I think we may get lucky and the price point would be way less than Slates. Slates has its own Mic Pre as well as a Mic plus software. With this one just a Mic and software. If they want this thing to really take off, I would say somewhere in the $500-$600 price range would really do well. Then they'll make more money on adding addition Mic's at an additional charge later. Just guessing, I have no affiliation with them. Hope we hear more soon!
    Haha, I should have looked better, in first place I thought we were just talking about a plugin. Anyways I agree that hardware like UAD that requires different hardware should be reasonably priced. Adding additional mics for additional cost sounds better to me than having to buy a complete system at higher costs.

  6. #36
    Experienced UAD User Solidtrax's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    142
    I was actually thinking of getting myself a better microphone, now that I have a lovely Twin Duo and some amazing sounding Unison plugins. This is really interesting and I will wait for a real announcement before I buy anything else, as this might be exactly what I need (and want!).
    Sound Design | Mixing | Mastering
    www.solidtrax.nl

    Core i5 6600K | Asrock Z170 Extreme4 | 16GB DDR4 | UAD-2 Satellite Octo USB | Apollo Twin Duo USB | Windows 10 | Cubase Pro 8.5 | Bitwig Studio |

  7. #37
    Superman Sid Chigger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Nashville
    Posts
    842
    This looks fantastic.. Like a lot of folks, I've been eyeing the Slate offering and have held off hoping someone else would take this path too. I have the Slate FGX mastering plugin and like it. But I'm leery.. Support and promised updates have been non-existant. A choice between UA & Slate is a no brainer to me..

    A big welcome to the Family to the Townsend folks.. I look forward to using your products!
    Win 10 64, i7 5960, 32GB, FF UFX, Octo & 2 Quads, Cubase 8

  8. #38
    UAD User
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    38
    I'm not particularly fond of Slate, his demeanour and marketing mumbo-jumbo. A few quality products, but in general, meeh. But I too looking at the his mic modeller offering, but hands down I trust UAD a million times over, especially in the modelling department.

    I mean, it there really anyone out there with more modelling experience than UAD?

    Congrats Townsend, very glad this is coming out. Super excited to hear it!

  9. #39
    Heavy UAD User Daviskenn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Nashville
    Posts
    591
    Quote Originally Posted by Equalizer85 View Post
    Amazing product, but I guess this will be one of the pricier ones ($300-350)
    Ummm...I would imagine we're looking at $1500 here.
    www.realgearonline.com

  10. #40
    Heavy UAD User Daviskenn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Nashville
    Posts
    591
    Quote Originally Posted by sjgam View Post
    On the concept of mic modeling itself ...

    Cant help but think that the quality and engineering of the mic itself is important. Scrubbing up a cheap Chinese mic intake with software doesnt sound appetizing but sounds like a lot more than that going on. But then again I invested in a vintage amp and pedals for my guitar and now am very impressed with the UAD Fender amp and pedals as well as Axe and Kemper.

    I guess I am representative of the guy that says its hard to capture real analog hardware with software based on stuff done a few years ago.

    And then you see what UAD does (I have almost all of their plugins) and then you see the amp sims and then the room sims (OWS) - and realize that good dsp modelling is a viable way to even get the feel of the amp. Still on the fence about Soundworks trying to get an acoustic guitar sound after the fact although I like it as a creative tool.

    Long winded way to say what is the quality/engineering (third party manufacturer?) of the mic itself - does it sound good on its own -what is its "hardware" sound - very clean to allow character at the plugin level?

    And is the general thought for the home ITB hobby guy (me) is that like OWS gives us access to OWS with adjustments allowed, this gives us access to a mic locker we cant afford and a recorded sound hard for us to get in our home less than ideal sound situation and for the pro - simply another creative tool to add to their mic locker and studio room?

    Have to laugh at myself that I am resistant to the dsp thing based on early experiences with Boss early modeling guitar gear and each hardware type - comp, eq, reverb etc and then amp and pedals, I gradually succumb and eat my words and right now mic modeling sounds goofy to me. History has proved me wrong.

    Next frontier is dsp modeling biology - vocal chords - dial in a Bowie, Bono, Morrison, Vedder, Young, Dylan voice - (voice from the talkback mic - can I get a bit more Dylan scratchy growl please?)

    This is TOTALLY my question. There are TONS of cheap mics - under $2500 mics - that have capsules that seem to collapse when you hit them hard. They "pinch"...If this is a $300 787 mic, then it will pinch - and in turn ever emulation will pinch. But hey - I'd love for that not to be the case. In the real world examples I've heard of the Slate mic, it seems pretty sibilant to my ears.
    www.realgearonline.com

Page 4 of 38 FirstFirst 1234567814 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 5th October 2016, 10:25 PM
  2. Console 2.0 - Cant record send effects when UAD record button selected
    By tyerac in forum Support & Troubleshooting
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 9th March 2016, 04:21 PM
  3. UAD Product Team on This Forum
    By sjgam in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 8th April 2015, 11:51 AM
  4. Next UAD/Apollo Product Ideas?
    By bc3 in forum Apollo Interfaces
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 3rd March 2015, 01:55 AM
  5. UAD Product Photo usage terms?
    By haftarun8 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 28th December 2010, 01:20 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •