Arys Chien
Active Member
I've experimented for a couple of times. To my ear the highs (all the way to the super highs) of the 1073 plug-in sounds better than the Pultec (Pro).
(\"Better\" = smoother and more clarity here.)
In my experience it sounds like a better up-sampling/ processing it/ then down-sampling back procedure. I noticed that when I first tried out different method of up/down sampling the same file with Samplitude.
And since the 1073 plug-in came out much later than the Pultec (Pro), it's reasonable to assume that UA had found a better up/down-sampling method.
But that's my guess. Maybe it's just that you can boost more highs with the 1073 than the Pultec....
(\"Better\" = smoother and more clarity here.)
In my experience it sounds like a better up-sampling/ processing it/ then down-sampling back procedure. I noticed that when I first tried out different method of up/down sampling the same file with Samplitude.
And since the 1073 plug-in came out much later than the Pultec (Pro), it's reasonable to assume that UA had found a better up/down-sampling method.
But that's my guess. Maybe it's just that you can boost more highs with the 1073 than the Pultec....