makinghits
Active Member
can't wait to pay 2k for the 1073
I think you forgot this, though: each instance @ 44.1K costs ~$200 (half a card), so it's practically more expensive than the real thing. :wink:Doublehelix said:As someone else mentioned in another thread around here somewhere, that is about the going price of a decent Space Echo on Ebay right now, and you only get one, along with all of the problems that go with an old, beatup, tape-based device.
what makes you say this? Are you beta-testing the unit already? if so, spill some more beansTony Ostinato said:its also an historical marker in physical modeling technology.
AFAIK, it's not in beta testing yet. You can use that as a gauge of the release schedule.olafmol said:what makes you say this? Are you beta-testing the unit already? if so, spill some more beans![]()
I own the bundle. CamelSpace is a great idea machine but what makes it great is how all the effects work together, the actual quality of the individual effects isn't anything noteworthy. Similarly, I'd rate the quality of CamelPhat's actual filter as one of the lower available. What's your definition of value?Let me put it this way: I've been needing some effects. Been considering Camel Audio's. You can buy their whole bundle of Camel Phat, Camel Space, and even get the Cameleon 5000 for $300US. This is an example of good deal imo. Just because it has Roland's name on the product doesn't motivate me to buy.
Do you mean you have several real tape delay units? Or, that you have several software echo plugs. Because basically the VST echo plugs are terrible. The ones that claim to be "tape" echo are a total joke. What they are is noisy echo. There is really no way to compare the existing plug to the Space Echo yet. If it works as a tape emulation unit, it will be worth every dime you have spent on your UADs all by itself.Raaen said:For me I have various tape delays that I really don't use all that much. So my need and justification to part with that kind of doe doesn't exist (not that UAD-Roland couldn't create that need :!: ).
I knew that was going to cause some confusion.....I have the software variety. I'm certainly going to try out the demo, and believe me if I see that value in it, I'm going to buy it.sj_digriz said:Do you mean you have several real tape delay units? .Raaen said:For me I have various tape delays that I really don't use all that much. So my need and justification to part with that kind of doe doesn't exist (not that UAD-Roland couldn't create that need :!: ).
ok, and my point there is....Raaen said:I knew that was going to cause some confusion.....I have the software variety. I'm certainly going to try out the demo, and believe me if I see that value in it, I'm going to buy it.sj_digriz said:Do you mean you have several real tape delay units? .Raaen said:For me I have various tape delays that I really don't use all that much. So my need and justification to part with that kind of doe doesn't exist (not that UAD-Roland couldn't create that need :!: ).
Raaen