In addition to the unified GUI, the main benefit is that it auto switches between DSP when the track is Rec enabled, and native/CPU when it's not.Was just curious. I have both but wanted a better understanding of why I might pick one or the other. What would be the difference between running the console emulation or just having the vision in an insert? Forgive the rookie question. Thank you!
Indeed, ALL UAD plugins that exist on both platforms now do this.The Vision Console Extension and Vision Plugin BOTH do the auto switching between DSP and CPU thing.
So it's not a reason to choose the extension over the plugin, since they BOTH function the same way, in this particular context. The OP was asking about differences between the extension and plugin. This is not a difference. They are they same, in this particular context.Indeed, ALL UAD plugins that exist on both platforms now do this.
It's one of the benefits of being in control of the entire recording experience.![]()
So that leaves unified GUI and window management.So it's not a reason to choose the extension over the plugin, since they BOTH function the same way, in this particular context. The OP was asking about differences between the extension and plugin. This is not a difference. They are they same, in this particular context.
So that leaves unified GUI and window management.
Thanks guys!! That helped clear things up. Loving the UA experienceSo that leaves unified GUI and window management.
Glad to hear it!! And thanks for the support.Thanks guys!! That helped clear things up. Loving the UA experience![]()