Cheap Hi-Z guitar splitter?

David MacNeill

Hall of Fame Member
I want to send my guitar output to my pedalboard and to my Apollo’s Hi-Z input. My Radial DI could do it with its Through output and a XLR-to-TS cable from it’s XLR output, but that would convert the latter signal to Lo-Z. And body know of a cheap buffered splitter that sends Hi-Z to both outs?
 

Joe Porto

Hall of Fame Member
I’ve been down this road…

There are none I know of that will not compromise high end. Lehle P-split is the only passive hi-z splitter I’ve found that retains high end, and that still slightly changes the dynamic response from the isolated side.

Even the Radial Bigshot transformer has noticeable HF rolloff. Of coarse, using a buffer before the split will retain high end, but output will be low-Z.

What is your pedal board feeding? If it’s an amp, you will need transformer isolation to prevent ground loop, but if it’s a modeler pedal, you most likely will not. Easiest way to split in that scenario is a buffer into a y-cable, but as you said, would result in Lo-Z signal to Apollo.
 

David MacNeill

Hall of Fame Member
I’ve been down this road…

There are none I know of that will not compromise high end. Lehle P-split is the only passive hi-z splitter I’ve found that retains high end, and that still slightly changes the dynamic response from the isolated side.

Even the Radial Bigshot transformer has noticeable HF rolloff. Of coarse, using a buffer before the split will retain high end, but output will be low-Z.

What is your pedal board feeding? If it’s an amp, you will need transformer isolation to prevent ground loop, but if it’s a modeler pedal, you most likely will not. Easiest way to split in that scenario is a buffer into a y-cable, but as you said, would result in Lo-Z signal to Apollo.
My main studio pedalboard feeds in stereo to the rack Apollo silverface. The Donner is a passive A/B splitter to route the signal to a second smaller group of pedals on my desk for ambient stuff which feeds another stereo pair in the silverface. I want to split my mono guitar before the Peterson tuner. So I can track with the pedalboard and a mono Hi-Z on the Apollo as a raw backup of each take.

My guitar signal currently jacks into the Peterson, then flows into the Donner A/B, 1176, Fender tube tremolo, Lion (where it turns into stereo from there on), Ruby, Rotary, MicroPitch, and Del-Verb, then out to the silverface.

IMG_2303.jpeg
 
Last edited:

Joe Porto

Hall of Fame Member
My main studio pedalboard feeds in stereo to the rack Apollo silverface. The Donner is a passive A/B splitter to route the signal to a second smaller group of pedals on my desk for ambient stuff which feeds another stereo pair in the silverface. I want to split my mono guitar before the Peterson tuner. So I can track with the pedalboard and a mono Hi-Z on the Apollo as a raw backup of each take.

My guitar signal currently jacks into the Peterson, then flows into the Donner A/B, 1176, Fender tube tremolo, Lion (where it turns into stereo from there on), Ruby, Rotary, MicroPitch, and Del-Verb, then out to the silverface.
Let’s think this through for a minute. You basically want a safety copy. Without anything in the Unison slot, there’s nothing for the high impedance signal to react to. It’s basically going through the non-compensated DI of the Apollo. Once it is recorded, you will either use plugins in the box (signal already recorded, so no impedance interaction) or you’re going to come out of an Apollo out at low impedance and possibly use a reamp that will convert to hi impedance into your pedalboard or amp.

Does that all make sense? I’m not seeing an advantage of keeping the split hi-Z. If you were going to record the split through a Unison preamp, possibly, but not a direct safety copy.

I use the P-split in a live 2-amp setup where I have a fuzz after the split. The fuzz sounds like ass after a buffered split, and the amps clean up better when fed the hi-z pickup signal directly.

In your case, you’re past anything hi-z can do once you’re digital. I would just buffer split to an Apollo DI or use a direct box into mic pre for the safety copy. I don’t think your $200 is going to get much in this use case.
 

GregJ

Active Member

 
Last edited:

klasaine

Hall of Fame Member
Not “cheap” but no signal loss or degradation at all.
Radial “Twin City” …

I got one second hand for around $150 or so.
Theres a few on Reverb around that price.
 

Joe Porto

Hall of Fame Member
Not “cheap” but no signal loss or degradation at all.
Radial “Twin City” …

I got one second hand for around $150 or so.
Theres a few Reverb around that price.
Just to be clear, Dave is inquiring about a quality passive high impedance splitter, which are very expensive. These have certain use scenarios, but I believe what he is looking to do can in fact be done with an active splitter. In fact, a Y cable after any high quality active buffer will yield transparent results. After reading Dave’s use scenario, I too recommend an active lo-z buffer/splitter.
 

flandybob

Venerated Member
I’m using a Palmer PGA 03 which is relatively cheap and I can’t say I hear much of a difference between the direct signal and the signal with the Palmer. I used to use it to split my bass before I got a « proper » DI (RNDI in my case).
I’m not sure I get why you don’t just use the DI you already have for the safety clean track, the DI in Apollo is OK but nothing exceptional
 

David MacNeill

Hall of Fame Member
Let me clarify my scenario a bit more…

Until I got the Lion pedal, I tracked my guitar parts basically raw — plinkety-plinkety — after I worked out the part (I always compose my solo parts these days with a little improvisation within those parts) with the UA Marshall Plexi plugin in a normal insert, not in Console. Yes, I understand the benefits of the impedance matching thing it does, but I found it was much easier for me to edit my parts in raw audio straight from the guitar. I used to be a guitar slinger of some regional renown back in the 70’s and 80’s, but I’m over all that showoff stuff and that’s why I compose my solos now.

The Lion pedal, followed by the Ruby pedal, totally changed my approach to guitar parts. Now I usually just find the right tone and work it out with The pedalboard and pipe it into the Apollo in stereo as described above. I usually commit and lately I’ve had to edit the parts less — maybe I’m becoming a better guitarist? Sure, why not — I’m only 68!

But I have gone back to a song after a few weeks in the can and decided I used too much distortion or Del-Verb or something like that, but the part is printed. If I want to change it, I have to play it again. I don’t know about you, but I never get the exact same feel the second time, hence my desire for an easy way to have the original raw track to process using my Lion or Ruby plugins if I need to.

PS: I just read in another thread here that UA has recommended inserting a UAD distortion plugin in a Unison slow but turn off the effect, thus generating an impedence-matched signal into whatever amp plugin inserts you like to come afterward. This could be a better-sounding alternative to my plinkety-plinkety raw-dog tracking, but I would still need a Hi-Z splitter of some kind to feed my pedalboard’s amp pedals. Some experimentation is in order!
 

David MacNeill

Hall of Fame Member
I’m using a Palmer PGA 03 which is relatively cheap and I can’t say I hear much of a difference between the direct signal and the signal with the Palmer. I used to use it to split my bass before I got a « proper » DI (RNDI in my case).
I’m not sure I get why you don’t just use the DI you already have for the safety clean track, the DI in Apollo is OK but nothing exceptional
I tried that with a DI using an ancient Carvin impedance matching transformer adapter thingy that is XLR on one end and Hi-Z TS on the other, but it’s very fiddley hanging off the desktop Apollo’s Hi-Z input and is so long it forces me to move my FaderPort. It may seem like a small thing to rearrange my desk to track guitar parts, but it really bugs me to do that when I’d rather have a permanent splitter all patched in and always at the ready when inspiration strikes. It’s worth spending some money to achieve that simplicity and readiness.
 

klasaine

Hall of Fame Member
If it's any consolation, regarding the price of these things, I have always found multiple utilitarian uses for my higher-end splitters. The Lehle gear is top notch and you can run it over with a car.
 
Last edited:

Rainflower

Hall of Fame Member
Sorry I did t read th entire post…radial makes this..that might work?


edit: This basically splits a single guitar into 4 outputs, that can be either switched with the buttons or used in an ‘all on’ setting so all outputs can be used at the same time.
 
Last edited:

Nyoak34

Established Member
Let me clarify my scenario a bit more…

Until I got the Lion pedal, I tracked my guitar parts basically raw — plinkety-plinkety — after I worked out the part (I always compose my solo parts these days with a little improvisation within those parts) with the UA Marshall Plexi plugin in a normal insert, not in Console. Yes, I understand the benefits of the impedance matching thing it does, but I found it was much easier for me to edit my parts in raw audio straight from the guitar. I used to be a guitar slinger of some regional renown back in the 70’s and 80’s, but I’m over all that showoff stuff and that’s why I compose my solos now.

The Lion pedal, followed by the Ruby pedal, totally changed my approach to guitar parts. Now I usually just find the right tone and work it out with The pedalboard and pipe it into the Apollo in stereo as described above. I usually commit and lately I’ve had to edit the parts less — maybe I’m becoming a better guitarist? Sure, why not — I’m only 68!

But I have gone back to a song after a few weeks in the can and decided I used too much distortion or Del-Verb or something like that, but the part is printed. If I want to change it, I have to play it again. I don’t know about you, but I never get the exact same feel the second time, hence my desire for an easy way to have the original raw track to process using my Lion or Ruby plugins if I need to.

PS: I just read in another thread here that UA has recommended inserting a UAD distortion plugin in a Unison slow but turn off the effect, thus generating an impedence-matched signal into whatever amp plugin inserts you like to come afterward. This could be a better-sounding alternative to my plinkety-plinkety raw-dog tracking, but I would still need a Hi-Z splitter of some kind to feed my pedalboard’s amp pedals. Some experimentation is in order!
I would just take a straight DI plus your processed pedals on the thru... and then get a reamp box to reamp back through the gear you normally like to use if you need to.
 

David MacNeill

Hall of Fame Member
If it's any consolation, regarding the price of these things, I have always found multiple utilitarian uses for my higher-end splitters. The Lehle gear is top notch and you can run it over with a car.
That’s good since I already ordered it!
 

David MacNeill

Hall of Fame Member
I would just take a straight DI plus your processed pedals on the thru... and then get a reamp box to reamp back through the gear you normally like to use if you need to.
Good suggestion, but I rarely use my amps anymore so I won’t need a reamp box. My JDI would do this but I’d rather keep it Hi-Z if I can.
 

klong

Established Member
I have a buffered splitter mini-pedal made by Saturnworks which I have never had any problem with. Splits one guitar signal into two. I use it to make a dry backup recording for re-amping etc. This is the one, $69 , takes normal 9v pedal cable.

 

David MacNeill

Hall of Fame Member
I have a buffered splitter mini-pedal made by Saturnworks which I have never had any problem with. Splits one guitar signal into two. I use it to make a dry backup recording for re-amping etc. This is the one, $69 , takes normal 9v pedal cable.

Interesting! I think I will get one to try.
 

Rainflower

Hall of Fame Member
I have a buffered splitter mini-pedal made by Saturnworks which I have never had any problem with. Splits one guitar signal into two. I use it to make a dry backup recording for re-amping etc. This is the one, $69 , takes normal 9v pedal cable.

I have a few Saturnworks pedals, these pedals are well built. They can make custom pedals as well…pretty much any splitter, mixer, blender, a/b(y)…tap tempo…good stuff!
 
UAD Bundle Month
Top