• Welcome to the General Discussion forum for UAD users!

    Please note that this forum is user-run, although we're thrilled to have so much contribution from Drew, Will, and other UA folks!

    Feel free to discuss both UAD and non-UAD related subjects!

    1) Please do not post technical issues here. Please use our UAD Support Forums instead.

    2) Please do not post complaints here. Use the Unrest Forum instead. They have no place in the the General Discussion forum.

    Threads posted in the wrong forum will be moved, so if you don't see your thread here anymore, please look in the correct forum.

    Lastly, please be respectful.

CR monitoring level

MASSIVE Mastering

Active Member
It varies from person to person, but the point on the (Fletcher-Munson) curve where human hearing is most accurate across the spectrum is approximately 85dB.

It's a nice place to \"stay\" but be sure to visit the other areas of 75dB and 90+dB on occasion.
 

MASSIVE Mastering

Active Member
Radio Shack actually makes a decent unit for 40 or 50 bucks.

Take a pink noise file at 0VU (-14dBfs) and play it.

Turn up the volume until you're at around 83dB, C-weighted, slow response (if you have a response control) at the listening position.

That should be your new \"0\" point on whatever your volume control is.
 

giles117

Active Member
Here is the other benefit. It allows longer listening times (about 8 hours at 85db) without damage or ear fatigue.

It also allows for more accurate positioning of elements in a mix. Especially Vocals due to there average level verses a peaking level.

Although I tend to live around 74-78dB most times. peaking at 83-85
 

number9

New Member
I tend to monitor at much lower levels. I find this more comfortable, less ear fatiguing and more neighbour friendly in the night. For checking of stereo imaging and reverb tails I use headphones.

Most of the time this works out ok, what are possible culprits of low level monitoring?
 
UAD Bundle Month
Top