• Welcome to the General Discussion forum for UAD users!

    Please note that this forum is user-run, although we're thrilled to have so much contribution from Drew, Will, and other UA folks!

    Feel free to discuss both UAD and non-UAD related subjects!

    1) Please do not post technical issues here. Please use our UAD Support Forums instead.

    2) Please do not post complaints here. Use the Unrest Forum instead. They have no place in the the General Discussion forum.

    Threads posted in the wrong forum will be moved, so if you don't see your thread here anymore, please look in the correct forum.

    Lastly, please be respectful.

liquid mix

neil wilkes

Venerated Member
Mac only :cry:
 

JuergenW

Active Member
Today I came in touch with the Liquid mix @ 44.1 KHz operation.

The compressors are really nice to adjust, and add much more
flavour than I expected!! The EQ´s however aren´t my choice...
Maybe at higher samplerates they´ll sound sweeter in the highs.
(I just had a few minutes to get impressions in a Music Store)

All in all it´s nice for the money. The surface is good for adjusting
the compressor - the eq section is not that comfortable to edit,
due to no direct access to all bands the same time.
 

digigem

Member
Great.. Got some stock in the office but no demo units can't really open a new unit for demo.
Havent had feedback on the Liquid Mix from anyone...Do you know of any other person/forum who has any bad/positive feedback?
Many thanks for your Feedback.
 

Eric Dahlberg

Purveyor of musical dreams fullfilled.
JuergenW said:
The compressors are really nice to adjust, and add much more
flavour than I expected!! The EQ´s however aren´t my choice...
Maybe at higher samplerates they´ll sound sweeter in the highs.
(I just had a few minutes to get impressions in a Music Store)
Strange! I would've expected the opposite.
 

taylor

Active Member
yeah, really interested in this... no reports yet on Gearslutz....

eric.. you have them in yet?
 

KAyo

Member
Hi Guys,

I've been using the Liquid mix for over a month now!!! Infact, I just finished a track last night, using the Lmix...The Lmix is great, I totally dig it.

The EQ is nice, not as astounding as i imagined it would be, but with the usage over the past few days mixing, I think its done a great job, for the mix overall. It's like TANG (the drink remember). Not too sweet, nor too tangy, just afloat in between.. :wink:

The Compressor is flexible, infact too versatile, really like it. I can't say it was very aggressive harmonically, even though I tried to push it to go agro. But nonetheless, it gave class when asked for it, and rigid if need be or just calm and smooth if called for. friggin gymnast!!! :D

Anyway, I did have a few sputters in the session. I guess, they were due to my Powercore FW, sharing the FW card. But, overall a rock solid experience.

Now, a word from experience.
Having owned the Powercore FW/ 2x UAD/ and now the LMix, I've come to the following conclusions. I can't say the LMix experience was overwhelming, although sound wise, the mix sounds so much more different than using the Poco or UAD's, which was nice, to add that to the sound palette… was cool. The ergonomics could have been better, but I am a sound person, a little trouble doesn't stop me from seeking new toys, its part of the deal. But, after having tried it at the shop, I did find my hands seeking for my wallet, which is a good sign and a bad one monatary wise…Damn! Plugs.

Now, I await the SSL Duende……. OOpppsss... here go the hands again :wink:

Cheers!
 

JuergenW

Active Member
It´s strange, but in Logic the meters of the Liquid Mix doesn´t match
with Logic´s. In fact it´s about 4 dBFS lower in the Liquid Mix than
in Logic´s channel meter (what really bothers me). :?

The EQ´s are okay for anything but treble - at this it´s not much better
than Channel EQ (at 44.1 KHz). All EQ models lack dynamic - don´t
expect the big \"Ah ha!\" like with UA-Neve or Pultec. They´re static to
my ears. But the compression sounds nice! 8)
 

JuergenW

Active Member
JuergenW said:
They´re static to
my ears. But the compression sounds nice! 8)
...one hour later...

Sorry, but after using the device today for a longer time I have
to change my statement: To my ears this unit sucks finally!
In fact, all compressor replicas sound nearly the same. You can´t
adjust the attack/release times precise enough, also the release
times are really slowish!! you can´t get punch out of the
compressor - no compare to UA-1176/ LA2A and Fairchild!
Dynamic Convolution can´t beat circuit emulation - after this
session this is more clear for me.
 

JuergenW

Active Member
I remind the following UA-webzine article:

http://www.uaudio.com/webzine/2004/july/index2.html

And it´s true! You can´t do good compressor emulation with
convolution. It can´t react like a circuit.

I tried the 1176 convolution in ALL-BUTTON mode... anyone
who has tried it loves the crank´d up and brutal sound it
does. Because the UA-1176 is a feedback compressor it \"calculates\"
the GR-sidechain after the Gainreduction.
But in the convolution it calculates sample by sample, there
is no reaction (feedback) after an actual gain reduction.
It sounds slowish as an old chewing gum and has nothing to do
with 1176 All-Button!! NO compare! period :!:
 

lordward

Active Member
Hey guys,

I'm just giving one a try now.......
I will not buy this unit. I'd rather use some native plugins Teleported with another computer. It's the same price in the long run and I find that my Waves SSL bundle sounds much nicer and are easier (nostalgically speaking) to handle.

Nope.... I'm really not impressed. But I'm also one of the people who laughed the first time I tried to get some use out of the Liquid Channel (yuk!).
I also had sputter problems, probably due to a Powercore FW (I'm trying this unit at another studio I am working at now, not my own) sharing the same FW port.

This is just my opinion after trying to do a mix for one day and I will use the unit now simply because I am limited in DSP where I am working at the moment. Perhaps I'll change my opinion but I seriously doubt it. I might give it a second try when it becomes available for PC. I'm more impressed by the price and what it does for the price and I really WANT this thing to sound good..... but my ears are not giving me that benefit of a doubt.... damn.....

When you get the chance try it yourself, it's the only way really.

DW
 

BobYordan

Member
Dan Duskin said:
Anyone else try LiquidMix yet?
I just listened to Liquid Mix & Duende in the local music store for 1 hour.

And I was more impressed with the Duende sound in that short time.
Especially the Eq.

Sadly it is to expensive for my needs.

I agree that the Liquid Mix controller is very cool. 8)

I also think that impulses are not ideal for dynamic processing.

There where no Eq presets except for building block Eq presets, as far as I could see. :-k

Perhaps if Focurite added some reverb also it might be more attractive?
 

WildCowboys

Active Member
there is a drumfile on dancetech.com processed with different models of the LMix dynamics. The models definiteley sound different from each other, and I even remembered the sound of my old Joemeek comp that I sold 7 years ago....I could tell the C2 emulation out of the bunch anytime...so I have to disagree that there are almost no differences in sound between the compressor models.....and honestly, though I did not tweak any parameters myself, the resulting sound did not suck in any way, it sounded very good in fact.

can´t say anything about the eqs, never heard them.

and I also disagree with the generalisation that dynamics cannot be done well with convolution. as far as I know the waves SSL plugins are convolution based (please correct me if i am wrong) and they sound excellent. besides, the original sintefex machines were loved by many, many professional mixers and engineers so far, so dynamic convolution should be far from a bad concept.

rock on!
pat
 

RobPain

Member
Did I miss something, or has anyone commented about running this at higher sample rates? How much difference does it make?
 

bugsstar

Member
the compressors sound different !
if you have a hard time hearing that you need to do something different, i don't know what maybe stop making music or focus...

\"Dynamic Convolution can´t beat circuit emulation\"
well it's really taking off just now so we might just wait with that conclusion
besides measuring inside the machine is also dynamic convolution. You measure 1 point to another. The more known \"dynamic convolution\" uses the input and ouput but both are based on the same idea. There are also different ways to do the impulses, The more work that went into the impulses the better it sounds.

nobody complained with sintefex, nobody is complaining at Tritone, nobody is complaining with waves SSL, ...

Duende is a different story as it takes the math processing of their digital consoles. Different League.

Let's start with mixes instead of individual tracks. soloing a track might sound as crap but in the mix might fit perfectly. The liquid mix is very useable.


\"To my ears this unit sucks finally!\"
Take it back and get something else
extremes don't help anyone
 
UAD Bundle Month
Top