• Welcome to the General Discussion forum for UAD users!

    Please note that this forum is user-run, although we're thrilled to have so much contribution from Drew, Will, and other UA folks!

    Feel free to discuss both UAD and non-UAD related subjects!

    1) Please do not post technical issues here. Please use our UAD Support Forums instead.

    2) Please do not post complaints here. Use the Unrest Forum instead. They have no place in the the General Discussion forum.

    Threads posted in the wrong forum will be moved, so if you don't see your thread here anymore, please look in the correct forum.

    Lastly, please be respectful.

New PCIe 2.0 Spec offcially ratified

billybk1

Shareholder
I wonder how this will impact future UAD-2 development? Part of the new PCI Express 2.0 Bus Specification doubles the interconnect bit rate from the current 2.5 Gbps to 5 Gbps. As hardware/software developers, I am pretty sure UA has seen this coming, as the release candidate phase started over three months ago. Maybe the next UAD-1 will be PCIe 2.0 compliant?


http://www.dailytech.com/PCIe+20+Ratifi ... le5718.htm
 

Ten

Member
It will be compliant as the spec is backward compatible, but it wont take advantedge of it (the new speeds) whatsoever. Infact a new card wont come anywhere near to taxing even a current x1 pcie slot.

ten
 

Fundy

Established Member
I was just reading some of the following threads on that page and I as thinking \"obsessed\". I mean, why do people need all that power. Isn't it them creating the hole in ozone layer. :lol:
 
Fundy said:
I was just reading some of the following threads on that page and I as thinking "obsessed". I mean, why do people need all that power. Isn't it them creating the hole in ozone layer. :lol:
I think the industry has been embarassed for their lack of forethought and now the may be overcompensating ;) either that or there is stuff coming down the pike thats going to floor us all!! Maybe all of the above ??
 

RichR

Member
Maybe it's not important at 44.1 / 48Khz, but it is at higher resolutions. Why would we need \"oversampling\" for high quality plugins if we could work directly at 192Khz.
 

Fundy

Established Member
On a more serious note though, who is the extra bandwidth going to benefit? Mad teenage gamers whom are consumed with insanely need for fast stuff they don't really understand or could it benefit musicians/studio engineers who need as much power on interface as possible.

Now the difference in performance between ATA6 and S-ATA is notable, so I imagine the change from PCI-Conventional to PCI-E is too. However like all these newer technologies they are nowhere being taken to their theorotical limit.

It's like taking a Ferrari on a Sunday drive with your gran beside you. Having all that power but making use of it.
 
UAD Bundle Month
Top