• Welcome to the General Discussion forum for UAD users!

    Please note that this forum is user-run, although we're thrilled to have so much contribution from Drew, Will, and other UA folks!

    Feel free to discuss both UAD and non-UAD related subjects!

    1) Please do not post technical issues here. Please use our UAD Support Forums instead.

    2) Please do not post complaints here. Use the Unrest Forum instead. They have no place in the the General Discussion forum.

    Threads posted in the wrong forum will be moved, so if you don't see your thread here anymore, please look in the correct forum.

    Lastly, please be respectful.

SATA Controller that bypasses the PCI Bus??

imdrecordings

Venerated Member
Sweet Jesus, not another MOBO question!! :roll:
Hopefully this one can help others, using a FF800
Anybody know of a MOBO that can use a Core 2 DUO, 64bit WIN or Vista that bypass the PCI bus for controlling SATA..???

I'd like to go to bigger badder 10,000 rpm SATA drives, but with my FF800 I can't use them. Because my Sata controller is interupted by everything in the PCI bus...

Thanks...
p.s.- What about getting a SATA controller that hooks up to a PCIe slot and not use the onboard controler? Would that bypass the PCI bus? Or maybe get a PCIe FW800 card, would that bypass the PCI buss?

I'd like to save the PCI buss for the UADs..

Your thoughts and suggestions are appritiated :)[/b]
 

Fundy

Established Member
I'm not sure either route is going help very much. You could get a PCI-E Firewire or SATA card and go serial to bypass the parallel PCI devices. Obviously you just still need to access the PCI buss again. So you're right in saying that this could be a solution.

The only problem that could occur is the IRQ problems when sharing the devices when put in that order. SATA controllers are seen as additional SCSI controllers so should be ranked quite high up in the interupt list.

Mine is IRQ 20 (ACPI mode) on a Via KT600 chipset.
 
UAD Bundle Month
Top