After a somewhat in-depth sample rate conversation with someone, I have to ask;
Assuming one is working at 44.1kHz, what benefit does using, say, the 1073 have over the SE?
Obviously oversampling is used to minimalise anti-aliasing in the output/downsampled version, but if frequencies above 22050Hz aren't present in the initial version, what difference does it make?
The only thing i can think of is; Is the upsampled information averaged, by using all the extra samples to create an average for a given initial sample? If that is the idea, isn't a far greater factor than 4x or 8x oversampling required to be of any benefit?
I know a lot of people don't give a *bleep* but I'd really like to understand this, from a pure physics point of view. Don't be afraid to get technical :twisted:
:?
Thanks!
Assuming one is working at 44.1kHz, what benefit does using, say, the 1073 have over the SE?
Obviously oversampling is used to minimalise anti-aliasing in the output/downsampled version, but if frequencies above 22050Hz aren't present in the initial version, what difference does it make?
The only thing i can think of is; Is the upsampled information averaged, by using all the extra samples to create an average for a given initial sample? If that is the idea, isn't a far greater factor than 4x or 8x oversampling required to be of any benefit?
I know a lot of people don't give a *bleep* but I'd really like to understand this, from a pure physics point of view. Don't be afraid to get technical :twisted:
:?
Thanks!