Even though DBX is still around, I'd love to see a DBX 160VU emulation!Although it is unlikely to happen soon, I'd like them to model some more characterful compressors first.
good suggestionverstaerker said:oh yes an filterbank (like the sherman one) would be awesome!
I really agree with 4, 1 and 2 (in that order)Cabbage said:Here's my list:
1. SPL Transient Designer (what a life-saver)
2. DBX160
3. JoeMeek SC2 or some old Altec
4. Clean compressor (Cambridge Dynamics)
I would love to see a Precision Mastering Compressor. I think it would be great to have something along the lines of the Weiss DS1 MKII v1.3... or even like the Sony Oxford Dynamics plugin. Both of these devices are extremely high quality, and extremely versatile - a bit more versatile than the current crop of compressors available for the UAD-1. Don't get me wrong, I absolutely love UA compressors, but something with the capabilities of the above compressors would be wonderful...
What features in particular would be nice?
1) Parallel compression (a method by which the signal is split into two parallel streams - one is then compressed, one is left untouched... the uncompressed stream is delayed to be sample accurate with the compressed stream - they are then recombined. This method is detailed in Bob Katz's book mastering audio - you can also read more about it in the manual for the Weiss DS-1 compressor). This compression is called \"upward compression\" rather than the \"downward compression\" of most typical compressors.
2) In addition to parallel compression, it would be nice to be able to do multi-band (with the ability to solo each band)... at least with a few bands - AND to include parallel compression in this function - to make it possible to perform \"upward compression\" on only the bass frequencies - while leaving the high frequencies untouched.
3) Look ahead functionality to assure against \"overs\" or distortion.
4) Release hold
5) SOFT KNEE - similar to Sony Oxford Dynamics - but even more versatility - selectable curves (to be able to make the curve sharper at the beginning or end, rather than a linear curve. Also, selectable intensity like the Oxford currently has).
6) Expansion capability (upward and downward expansion) - for example, the ability to set the ratio to .93:1, and to select upward or downward expansion - to be tweakable into a gate, or to be used to enhance dynamic response.
7) Extremely flexible ratios - ability to do ratios of 1.02:1, or 1.03:1, etc. Very accurate.
Selectable release time constants (like the DS1).
9) Mid-side capabilities - including for each band of the multi-band! (the ability to compress only the \"mono\" material in the \"lower band\" of the multi-band if we so choose - or maybe to use the plugin as an expander on only the \"stereo\" material while leaving the \"mono\" material untouched).
10) Upsampled processing
That's what Nigel is (more or less).A Line6 Pod XT engine for UAD would be cool.