Makes no difference in processing in this case.
All UAD plugs within the next 180 days. Possible some will be released sooner. Not sure on that.
That seems a bit premature if AAX availability is your only issue. It'll probably take 180 days just to get all the inevitable PT11 bugs resolved.That means no purchases within the next 180 days of any plugins. IMHO UA had better devote their developers to work on migrating the plugins to AAX instead of creating new ones, hey , i am not gonna buy anything until it's AAX.
I might sell the whole rig (apollo) if it's a 180 days indeed. PT 11 is a lot more powerful , so the benefit from external processing power like the UAD is decreasing.
That seems a bit premature if AAX availability is your only issue. It'll probably take 180 days just to get all the inevitable PT11 bugs resolved.
Personally, i'm sticking with PT10 for a while until things have settled.
You're assuming those specs stayed the same for 2 years in the software world? ha. Avid pulled a typical Avid move. They pushed PT11 out the door bugs and all after missing 3 (or more) internal release deadlines. The SDK provided to developers and the AAX framework itself also has bugs, so some companies can't get their plugs working as they need to be. I'm not saying that's UA's case, as I have no idea... Developers are being more than kind by taking the brunt of people's AAX frustration without naming Avid as the problem, probably because they want priority Avid support wading through the current issues. So people need to give plugin developers a serious break when it comes to PT11 and AAX 64. Most developers saw the "gold master" the same time you and I did. Even if they were ready, the GM could've been a surprise (as it was to the likes of Celemony, etc).6 months for something they knew and had specs for for 2 years and promised to have out the same time as the PT11 launch during (NAMM Video)? Wow, that is very disappointing, I really expected this to be ready.
So the one company (Avid) that I never quite liked delivered a solid product on time and all the companies that I love dropped the ball this year... arrgh
So they should not progress?I have 250 plugins that do NOT work in PT11. I have some that NEVER will.
I have no ill feeling toward UA here. Avid is the problem, IMO.
No clue. I saw the writing on the wall last year and went HD Native and have been thrilled. TDM rig is collecting dust.They were on the right track, but then decided to further screw HD users. I looked on the DUC and it's confirmed they intentionally disabled HD cards from working as CoreAudio under PT11. What's the point of allowing both 10 and 11 if you can't use both?
Sure it does. Don't you remember PT10 was the bridge?Either way, that has nothing to do with AAX and the transition to 64.